Health & Fitness

In the video above, Dr. Andrew Saul, editor-in-chief of the Orthomolecular Medicine News Service, presents valuable information on the importance of vitamin C for disease treatment, including COVID-19 — information that’s being widely silenced via organized censorship.¹

His Tokyo presentation, “Orthomolecular Medicine and Coronavirus Disease: Historical Basis for Nutritional Treatment,” highlights the fact that when used as a treatment, high doses of vitamin C — often 1,000 times more than the U.S. Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) — are needed.

It’s a cornerstone of medical science that dose affects treatment outcome, but this premise isn’t accepted when it comes to vitamin therapy the way it is with drug therapy. Most vitamin C research has used inadequate, low doses, which don’t lead to clinical results.

“The medical literature has ignored over 80 years of laboratory and clinical studies on high-dose ascorbate (vitamin C) therapy,” Saul notes, adding that while it’s widely accepted that vitamin C is beneficial in fighting illness, controversy exists over to what extent. “Moderate quantities provide effective prevention,” he says, while “large quantities are therapeutic.”

Three Pioneers of High-Dose Vitamin C Therapy

Vitamin C is perhaps most well-known for its antioxidant properties — properties it maintains because of an ability to donate electrons to oxidized molecules. Even in small quantities, vitamin C helps protect proteins, lipids and DNA and RNA in your body from reactive oxygen species that are generated during normal metabolism as well as due to toxin exposure (such as to cigarette smoke and air pollution).

Vitamin C is also involved in the biosynthesis of collagen, carnitine and catecholamines, according to Rhonda Patrick, Ph.D., and as such, “vitamin C participates in immune function, wound healing, fatty acid metabolism, neurotransmitter production and blood vessel formation, as well as other key processes and pathways.”²

Vitamin C at extremely high doses, however, acts as an antiviral drug, actually killing viruses. While it does have anti-inflammatory activity, which helps prevent the massive cytokine cascade associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection, its antiviral capacity likely has more to do with it being a non-rate-limited free radical scavenger. Three pioneers of high-dose vitamin C therapy include:

Fact Checkers Flagged Expert Vitamin C Opinion as False

Cathcart, a physician with decades of experience using vitamin C to treat viral illness, said, “I have not seen any flu yet that was not cured or markedly ameliorated by massive doses of vitamin C.” Saul believes this would apply to any viral illness, including COVID-19. He posted the quote on Facebook, which quickly flagged it as “false information” according to its fact-checkers:

“Some so-called fact-checkers, employed by Facebook, decided that this statement is false. I do not understand how the opinion of a medical doctor can be considered false. You can disagree with it, but it’s not false. If this is what the doctor observed, if this is the doctor’s professional opinion, it is a valid point of view. But not on Facebook.”

February 12, 2020, Saul made the statement on Facebook that based on the research of Jungeblut, Klenner and Cathcart, “The coronavirus pandemic can be dramatically slowed, or stopped, with the immediate widespread use of high doses of vitamin C.” Facebook immediately blocked his post claiming it was false, based on the opinion — again — of anonymous fact-checkers, most of whom have no formal medical training.

He responded, “Preventing and treating respiratory infections with large amounts of vitamin C is well established. Those who believe that vitamin C generally has merit but massive doses are ineffective or somehow harmful would do well to read the original papers for themselves.”

Saul adds that while other nutrients are also important, he believes vitamin C is the most important “crisis therapy” for those who find themselves in the intensive care unit, extremely ill and at risk of dying from COVID-19. It’s also the least expensive preventive for the general public.

“After I posted that one mention about vitamin C and COVID,” Saul said, “vitamin C started selling out and disappearing from shelves in stores around the world. So I guess the fact-checkers were a little bit late. But ultimately, they did shut down the spread of this information — information about viruses being treated with vitamin C.”⁶

Chinese Physicians Recommend Vitamin C Treatment for COVID

Saul also highlights a study, published in Chinese, that detailed the accounts of four patients admitted to Xi’an Jiaotong University Second Hospital with COVID-19, who recovered in February 2020.

“High-dose vitamin C achieved good results in clinical applications,” the researchers noted, adding, “Vitamin C treatment should be initiated as soon as possible after admission,” and, “High-dose vitamin C can not only improve antiviral levels, but more importantly, can prevent and treat acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress.”

Although Saul shared this information, it was not picked up by the media. Another quote from Dr. ZhiYong Peng, chief of critical care at Zhongnan Hospital, Wuhan University, reads:

“In my department and other hospitals we highly recommend the patients use 12,000 milligrams to 24,000 mg a day of vitamin C. That works for significant reduction of COVID becoming a severe case. In my hospital, all the medical professionals are given vitamin C powder, to take 1,000 to 2,000 mg. I heard that the majority of the major hospitals in Wuhan are giving vitamin C powder to their medical professionals.”

Further, according to Saul, the government of Shanghai, China, officially recommends treating COVID-19 with intravenous vitamin C at a dose of 200 mg per kg of body weight per day, an adult intravenous dosage of approximately 16,000 mg/day. The protocol was published by the Chinese Medical Association.⁷ Facebook and its fact-checkers, again disagreed, flagging the information as “partly false.”

“They never contacted me to check my sources … They never contacted the hospitals … or anyone in China … They never contacted the experts that we quoted, and they never contacted the government of Shanghai,” Saul said. “They simply decided it was false news, and that was the end of it. I believe withholding vitamin C treatment information from the public withholds it from the patient. I accuse the media of negligence.”

Lancet Suggests High-Dose Vitamin C as ‘Rescue Therapy’

Even a commentary published in The Lancet: Respiratory Medicine in March 2020 states, “Rescue therapy with high-dose vitamin C can also be considered”⁸ in patients with respiratory failure from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) caused by COVID-19. “Very little has been done with this, unfortunately,” Saul states, despite it having been published in the earliest months of the pandemic.

Other articles and YouTube videos from physicians supporting the use of vitamin C for COVID-19 have also been censored or removed completely. One objection sometimes given is that high-dose vitamin C is dangerous, but as Saul notes, it’s one of the most studied therapies in history.

In 2007, a study published in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine by Harri Hemila, considered to be an authority on vitamin C, called potential harms of large doses of vitamin C “unfounded,” and stated that patients with pneumonia can take up to 100 grams a day of vitamin C without developing diarrhea, “possibly because of the changes in vitamin C metabolism caused by the severe infection.”⁹

Past research by Hemila and colleagues found that 17,000 mg/day of intravenous vitamin C shortened intensive care unit stays by 44%.¹⁰ According to Saul, Dr. Richard Cheng, a Chinese American physician, further reported that about 50 moderate to severe cases of COVID-19 infection were treated with high-dose vitamin C, involving 10,000 mg for moderate cases and 20,000 mg for more severe cases, for seven to 10 days.

Not only did all of the patients improve, but there were no side effects reported from the vitamin C therapy. “You guessed it,” Saul said, “Fact-checkers said it’s false. Facebook said it’s false. The media said it’s false. And this report, by a physician direct from Shanghai, who personally worked with the chief of emergency medicine of a major hospital, right there, and had success … all of this was called false information and banned from Facebook.”

‘This Is Organized Censorship’

In February 2020, Saul reports, the World Health Organization met with about a dozen tech companies, including Google, Amazon and YouTube, instructing them to stop the spread of coronavirus misinformation. The group, which planned to meet every few months, has been targeting information related to natural health treatments like vitamin C, calling them fake news and conspiracies.¹¹

But in reality, Saul said, the labeling of vitamin C for COVID-19 as fake news is “organized censorship. This does fit the description of conspiracy. They are trying to stop the information on vitamin C from getting out. And, unfortunately, to a large extent they have succeeded.”

Even Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said, on the record in 2016, “Take vitamin C. It can enhance your body’s defense against microbes.”¹²

Then, during the pandemic, he mentioned it again, in an Instagram interview, where he said that vitamin D will help your body resist infection, and added, “The other vitamin that people take is vitamin C because it's a good antioxidant, so if people want to take a gram or so of vitamin C, that would be fine.”^13,14

Cheng also interviewed a family in Wuhan, China, which took large doses of vitamin C and didn’t get COVID-19, despite close contact with a confirmed COVID-19 patient. The video was removed by YouTube. “I can’t believe this is happening,” Cheng said.

Dr. Paul Marik has also shown a protocol of intravenous vitamin C with hydrocortisone and thiamine (vitamin B1) dramatically improves survival rates in patients with sepsis. Since sepsis is one of the reasons people die from COVID-19 infection, Marik's vitamin C protocol may go a long way toward saving people's lives in this pandemic.

That protocol calls for 1,500 mg of ascorbic acid every six hours, and appears radically effective. However, I would recommend taking even higher doses using liposomal vitamin C if you're taking it orally.

Personally, I discourage people from taking mega doses of vitamin C on a regular basis if they're not actually sick. I view high dose vitamin C as a very safe and effective intervention for acute upper respiratory infections largely because it converts to hydrogen peroxide, which your body uses to fight infections.

I don’t believe it is necessary to take high doses for long periods of time, however. Vitamin C’s potential for treating severe illness, and helping to prevent it, is something that should be widely shared, not silenced.

For more information and further reading, Saul’s Orthomolecular Medicine News Service has an archive of several dozen news releases on COVID-19 and nutrition that you probably have not seen in the media.¹⁵

from Articles https://ift.tt/2WdTA3H
via IFTTT

In 2019, the beauty industry had reached a value of $532 billion and is projected to rapidly rise in the coming years.¹ Personal care products are benefiting from targeted pricing, social media and companies aiming at sustainable alternatives. In other words, personal care products and cosmetics is big business.

At least since the times of ancient Egypt, women have been using products to enhance or alter their appearance.² With this long-lasting growth, toxins such as formaldehyde, parabens and phthalates have made their way into personal care products.³

One compound you may not have considered toxic is talcum powder. One of the largest companies to sell talcum is Johnson & Johnson, which launched their iconic baby powder in 1894. By 2018, their total annual sales were more than $81.6 billion.⁴

What’s in Your Makeup May Give You Cancer

The powdery ingredient that the beauty industry uses can be listed as talcum powder, talcum, cosmetic talc, or magnesium silicate. Talc is a mineral, which when crushed is particularly useful in a wide variety of products.⁵ The unique qualities include the ability to absorb odor, lubricate and resist high temperatures. This made it useful in cosmetics, powders, crayons, children's toys and even in roofing materials and polished rice.

The New York Times reports it's also used in pharmaceutical pills, supplements and chewing gum.⁶ Groups that test children's toys have found it in crime scene kits and crayons. Until the 1990s, it was used in surgical gloves and condoms.

A recent study published in Environmental Health Insights by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) has once again linked personal care products talcum containing with exposure to asbestos.⁷ One of the products tested in the study was designed specifically for use by children. So how does asbestos, a known carcinogen, contaminate talc?

Asbestos is the term given to six naturally occurring minerals that are made of flexible fibers. When these fibers are inhaled or ingested, they can be permanently trapped in your body. Over time they trigger inflammation and eventually genetic damage that can lead to an aggressive form of cancer called mesothelioma.

In nature, asbestos minerals are found with talc minerals so, during processing, there's a significant risk talcum can become contaminated with asbestos. When you think of asbestos you might first imagine home insulation, as that’s where it was primarily used for consumers. But the qualities of the product made it useful to the military, heavy construction and shipbuilding, as well. It became part of the beauty industry due to its ties to talcum.

Talcum can be found in over 2,000 personal care products including blush, face and body powders and eyeshadow. In their study, the EWG found 14.2% of the cosmetics that were tested were contaminated with asbestos. Tasha Stoiber, Ph.D., was one researcher in the study and scientist at EWG. She spoke to ZME Science about the results saying:⁸

“The prevalence of asbestos found in cosmetics from this study is troubling given that most people don’t expect asbestos to be in their make-up, especially not in children’s toy make-up. This highlights the lack of adequate screening of talc.”

Baby Powder Is Dangerous for Babies

The lack of adequate screening places the public at risk. The Cosmetic, Toiletry, and Fragrances Association, which represents the personal care product industry, stated in 1976 that all cosmetic products sold in the US “should be free from detectable amounts of asbestos according to their standards.”⁹

But, as ZME Science points out, testing is not standardized, and this became a loophole the industry exploited.¹⁰ Additionally, the testing that is done on talcum powder is voluntary by the manufacturers and the FDA has no authority to recall products when contamination is found.

The testing the industry uses currently is not sensitive enough to detect contamination, which is why the EWG is lobbying for a more reliable method to be used across the U.S. Talcum powder is the main ingredient in Johnson & Johnsons core baby product. However, while most parents would presume it’s safe for babies because it’s labeled for babies, the American Academy of Pediatrics has warned parents of baby powder dangers since 1969.¹¹

In March 2020, the FDA released the results of a year-long study in which they tested 52 cosmetic products and found nine to be contaminated with asbestos.¹² One of those products was Johnson & Johnson's Baby Powder. Three others were makeup sold by Claire's and the remaining five were makeup sold by City Color.

The FDA (17.3%) and EWG (14.2%) tests found a similar percentage of personal care products were contaminated with asbestos. Another study published in 2014, found anthophyllite and tremolite, two asbestos minerals, in one brand of talc tested for litigation after a woman died from mesothelioma.¹³

The study did not name the brand of talc the woman had used for years, but the researchers wrote that a study published in 1976 found this same brand of talc had the highest level of asbestos of 20 commercial brands tested.¹⁴ The scientists in the study published in 2014, wrote:¹⁵

“Furthermore, we have traced the asbestos in the talc to the mines from which it originated, into the milled grades, into the product, and finally into the lung and lymph nodes of the users of those products, including one woman who developed mesothelioma.

Based on the testing and re-testing conducted by the authors, it is evident that this product line has been consistently contaminated with asbestos tainted talc derivatives. The amount of asbestos was variable based on the time of manufacture and the talc source.

In conclusion, we found that a specific brand of talcum powder contained identifiable asbestos fibers with the potential to be released into the air and inhaled during normal personal talcum powder application.

We also found that asbestos fibers consistent with those found in the same cosmetic talc product were present in the lungs and lymph node tissues of a woman who used this brand of talc powder and developed and died from mesothelioma.”

Johnson & Johnson Aware of the Issue Since 1957

In a 1995 letter to the editor published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, two physicians wrote of the health risks women faced when their partners used condoms covered in talcum powder, namely infertility and ovarian cancer.¹⁶ The doctor’s interest in talc began when they found it was an unwanted contaminant in 70% of the silicone gel breast implants they evaluated.

Johnson & Johnson was well aware of the health risks associated with talcum powder long before this. It wasn't until the company was sued by over 11,000 plaintiffs, who all claimed the baby powder had asbestos, that the full extent of their knowledge came to light.

In the documents the company had to be forced to release, it was revealed that they were aware of tainted samples in 1957 and 1958 when they asked an external lab to do an analysis.¹⁷ As reported by Reuters, when the FDA questioned Johnson & Johnson about asbestos contamination in the talc, the company issued a statement in which they denied any knowledge, saying:¹⁸

“Our fifty years of research knowledge in this area indicates that there is no asbestos contained in the powder manufactured by Johnson & Johnson.”

Despite indisputable evidence that asbestos is linked to cancer,¹⁹ and over 40 years of evidence that talcum powder can be contaminated with asbestos,^20,21,22 some experts continue to waffle on whether talcum powder can be dangerous.

For example, the American Cancer Society acknowledges that talc with asbestos is “able to cause cancer if it is inhaled.” But continues: “The evidence about asbestos-free talc is less clear.”²³

They make no mention of the lack of standardized testing, how to determine if the talc you’re buying has been tested and go on to say: “There is very little evidence at this time that any other forms of cancer are linked with consumer use of talcum powder.”²⁴

Company Uses Pandemic as a Reason to Pull Baby Powder

A study released in January 2020 pulled data from four cohort studies of 252,745 women. The results made headlines because the scientists asserted there “was not a statistically significant association between use of powder in the genital area and incident ovarian cancer.”²⁵

However, when carefully read,²⁶ the National Women’s Health Network (NWHN) found the participants were not asked about the type of powder used (talc or cornstarch) and the researchers acknowledge "specific exposure windows could not be examined, nor could type of powder used” [limitations].

Yet, the authors extrapolated the results to all powder, including talc. The NWHN goes on to reveal several more discrepancies that do not warrant the researchers’ conclusion.

Another study in the International Journal of Toxicology calls the talc and asbestos relationship “commonly misunderstood”²⁷ and “Industry specifications state that cosmetic-grade talc must contain no detectable fibrous, asbestos minerals.”

Johnson & Johnson continues to assert that talcum powder is safe, and their No. 1 reason is because “talc has been used for centuries.”²⁸ Then, in February 2020, the company announced they would voluntarily take their baby powder off the shelf in the U.S. and Canada.²⁹

USA Today reported the company did this “to focus on products with a higher priority during the coronavirus pandemic.” In other words, the company is using the pandemic response as a smoke screen to pull baby powder from the shelves.

The plan is to only remove it from the U.S. and Canadian market, which represent 0.5% of their total consumer health business.³⁰ Forbes reports this market was $13.8 billion in 2018.³¹

"Demand for talc-based Johnson’s Baby Powder in North America has been declining due in large part to changes in consumer habits and fueled by misinformation around the safety of the product and a constant barrage of litigation advertising."

Take Care With Your Personal Care Products

Unfortunately, many still believe that if a product is sold in the stores, it is likely safe for use. But, as this fight to remove cancer-causing talcum powder blatantly shows, manufacturers are willing to pay millions to make billions. The thousands of pending lawsuits against Johnson & Johnson are a reminder that it's a buyer beware market when it comes to personal care products.

Women may be exposed to an average of 168 chemicals daily and men, 85.³² Many of these have been linked to cancer, reproductive toxicities, asthma, allergies and other health problems.

There is no safety testing required before these personal care products hit the grocery store shelf and few chemicals have been banned in the U.S. since the industry is largely self-regulated. In other words, it's like the fox guarding the hen house.

You do have choices and the Environmental Working Group’s Skin Deep³³ database can help you make those choices. It contains a list of ingredients and safety ratings for close to 75,000 cosmetics and personal care products. This is an important step, since your skin is an excellent drug delivery system. What goes on your body is as important as what goes in your mouth.

Products bearing the "USDA 100% Organic" seal are among your safest bets if you want to avoid potentially toxic ingredients. Be aware that products boasting "all-natural" labels can still contain harmful chemicals, so be sure to check the full list of ingredients.

Better yet, simplify your routine and make your own products. A slew of lotions and hair treatments can be eliminated with a jar of coconut oil, for example, to which you can add a high-quality essential oil, if you like, for scent.

When it comes to talcum powder, my recommendation is to avoid it altogether. Also remember that adult women are not the ones most commonly exposed to talc. Most parents generously apply baby talcum powder to their baby's bottom at each diaper change, exposing both the parent and baby to inhaling the powder.

from Articles https://ift.tt/3qO4Vpp
via IFTTT

A muscle fiber consists of just one cell, but many nuclei. A team has now shown just how varied these nuclei are. The study can help us better understand muscle diseases such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/379XQYA

Could number two be number one when it comes to combating recurrent Clostridium difficile (CDI) infections? Using genetic material analysis and machine learning, researchers have pinpointed several key factors to ensure successful fecal microbiota transplants (FMT), which have proven successful in treating bacterial infections in the gut including illnesses like C. difficile, Crohn's Disease, Colitis and even obesity, explains lead author.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3ncSMIf

In low-income families, fathers who are engaged in their children's lives can help to improve their mental health and behavior, according to a new study.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2JTHNFe

High-intensity interval training strengthens the heart even more than moderate exercise does. Now researchers have found several answers to what makes hard workouts so effective.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/346i57p

Different languages describe motion differently, according to distinct lexical rules. And though we may not consciously notice those rules, we follow them -- and researchers have found they affect how our brains perceive and process descriptions of physical movement.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2JYvFmz

Depression is a mental disorder that affects more than 264 million people of all ages worldwide. Understanding its mechanisms is vital for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Scientists recently conducted a study showing that an imbalance in the gut bacterial community can cause a reduction in some metabolites, resulting in depressive-like behaviors. These findings show that a healthy gut microbiota contributes to normal brain function.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/376Ygia

The display of a smartphone reacts to finger pressure. The carnivorous Venus flytrap, on the other hand, even notices when a lightweight like a fly lands on it. Special genes make this possible.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3maN7kA

The Zika virus can remain in mouse brain for extended periods, leading to long-term neurological and behavioral consequences, according to a new study.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3462Knv

The mental symptoms of premenstrual dysphoric disorder improve following treatment with a progesterone receptor modulator. The mechanism of action of the study drug provides insights into the potential molecular mechanisms underlying this disorder and its treatment.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2KjgpAh

Pathological changes related to the disability of Parkinson's patients can already be detected in signals from the scalp without the need to open the skull.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3a1SyQt

Experts have now compiled international guidelines and standards for the treatment of complications of brain tumors.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2IL8SKs

A research team has developed a diagnostic tool for the rare neurological disease amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The study used the patented immuno-infrared sensor to analyze folding changes of proteins in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of ALS patients after specific binding.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3n9HkNP

Scientists reported they have designed a hydrogel membrane that may be used to house optical glucose sensing materials, toward building a biosensor for monitoring sugar levels in diabetics.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3m9dMP4

Updated national guidelines for treating infections caused by the deadly superbug Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) have been examined and approved.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3a653ur

A single strand of hair in a crime scene contains many clues that can help identify a perpetrator. In a recent study, scientists have combined two modern techniques, called surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy and X-ray fluorescence, to distinguish between different colors in individual hair strands. Both these techniques are almost non-destructive and can be conducted with portable devices, making this a promising way to get supportive evidence in forensic investigations.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2JM3jMo

Climbing four flights of stairs in less than a minute indicates good heart health, according to new research.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3manoci

Researchers have rebuilt a human thymus, an essential organ in the immune system, using human stem cells and a bioengineered scaffold. Their work is an important step towards being able to build artificial thymi which could be used as transplants.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/3a5ZAUr