Health, Fitness,Dite plan, health tips,athletic club,crunch fitness,fitness studio,lose weight,fitness world,mens health,aerobic,personal trainer,lifetime fitness,nutrition,workout,fitness first,weight loss,how to lose weight,exercise,24 hour fitness,
In early March, when most Americans began social distancing, the hope was that life would get back to normal after just a few weeks. It’s become clear now that some distancing will be needed for many more months, or even years, to keep the coronavirus at bay. But quarantine fatigue is real. Abstaining from all social contact for the long haul won’t be a sustainable option for most people. So, how can we make decisions about socializing during the coronavirus pandemic?
Public health messaging over the past several months has focused on staying home as much as possible. Staying home alone or with your household members is still the lowest-risk choice you can make with respect to catching or spreading the coronavirus. Being in a crowded indoor environment is the highest-risk choice.
But risk isn’t binary, and there’s a lot in between those two options. Thinking about a spectrum of risk can help you choose the lowest-risk options for socializing that will be sustainable for you in the long term.
The risk of contracting or transmitting the coronavirus depends on many factors. Here are some important considerations when you’re assessing risk to yourself and others.
Health is more than just disease prevention. For many people, being healthy requires social interactions with friends and family, spending time outdoors, exercise, physical intimacy, and other pleasures of life. When making decisions about social contact during the coronavirus pandemic, you will need to weigh the risk of the interaction against the potential benefits to your overall health.
Unlike abstinence-only messaging, which simply tells people to stay home, a harm reduction approach meets people where they are by accepting that it isn’t always possible to eliminate risk. It supports people in making lower-risk — but not necessarily zero-risk — choices that are sustainable for them, and offers strategies to reduce any potential harms. The abstinence-only and harm reduction approaches share the same goal of reducing illness and death, but from what we know about HIV, substance use, and other areas of health, harm reduction is far more likely to work.
Several examples of harm-reduction approaches to social contact have been adopted outside of the United States. Acknowledging that single people may need physical intimacy, the Netherlands has suggested that people find a seksbuddy, with one consistent sex partner being much less likely to spread the coronavirus than having multiple partners. Several provinces in Canada have issued guidance on “double bubbles,” in which two households agree to socialize exclusively with each other without the need for physical distancing.
It’s true that every additional social interaction increases risk, but with continued social distancing from other individuals and households, harm reduction approaches might help people forego higher-risk activities, like crowded house parties, over the long term. As we enter the fourth month of this pandemic, with many more months ahead, it’s time to start thinking about sustainability.
Follow me on Twitter @JuliaLMarcus
For more information on coronavirus and COVID-19, see the Harvard Health Publishing Coronavirus Resource Center.
The post How to socialize in a pandemic appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.