Health, Fitness,Dite plan, health tips,athletic club,crunch fitness,fitness studio,lose weight,fitness world,mens health,aerobic,personal trainer,lifetime fitness,nutrition,workout,fitness first,weight loss,how to lose weight,exercise,24 hour fitness,

04/21/20

The first publicly reported case of the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was reported in Wuhan, China, December 21, 2019. According to Pro-Med International Society for Infectious Diseases,1 those first patients had clinical signs consistent with viral pneumonia.

On January 21, 2020, the first confirmed case had reached the U.S. It was an individual living in Washington state who had recently visited Wuhan, China.2 The second case appeared January 24, 2020, in Illinois;3 this was also someone who had recently returned from Wuhan, the epicenter of the SARS-CoV-2.

Since then, the number of infections has spread rapidly across the U.S. and the world. A rising number of patients entering the hospital with contagious flu and SARS-CoV-2 has put a strain on personal protective equipment (PPE) needed by health care providers to stop the spread within health care facilities.

Nearly four months later, shortages of masks, gowns, gloves and face shields have left doctors and nurses at personal risk and at increasing levels of risk for spreading viruses to those who are not infected.4 One of the most effective face masks used to protect against airborne particles is the N95 mask.

One challenge to providing PPE to health care workers has been inadequate stockpiles and N95 face masks that exceeded their shelf life. On February 28, 2020, the CDC5 announced it was necessary to test a stockpile of N95 masks manufactured between 2003 and 2013.

Although preliminary results show the masks performed as expected, it seems as if they were never expected to be used. It’s also possible the stockpile had been forgotten, left to expire and not replaced with newer masks.

Doctors Fired for Wearing Masks

Reports of doctors and nurses losing their jobs after wearing face masks in hospital hallways have been making the news. As health care workers are on the front lines of caring for highly contagious individuals, many have resorted to finding their own face mask and wearing it while at work.

NPR tells the story of one traveling physician, Dr. Neilly Buckalew, who was assigned to Saint Alphonsus Regional Rehabilitation Hospital in Boise, Idaho.6 She purchased and brought her own PPE and N95 mask to work. On her first day, she was ordered to take it off.

The reasons the hospital administrators gave kept changing, but she was told if she wore the mask she would have to leave. She refused and was terminated. Buckalew is among the few who are speaking publicly since, as she puts it, "A lot of people can't speak out because they're afraid, or they know that they'll be fired."

The events surrounding the termination of Dr. Henry Nikicicz are told in The New York Times.7 After seeing a group of individuals in the hallway at the hospital, the anesthesiologist put on his mask to protect himself and them.

However, in the following days he found his job at the University Medical Center in El Paso was at risk. After refusing to stop wearing his mask, Nikicicz was removed from the schedule and suspended without pay. As The New York Times reported, he was sent a text message from:8

“… the chief of anesthesia, accusing him of overreacting. The text read: ‘UR WEARING IT DOWN A PUBLIC HALL. THERES NO MORE WUHAN VIRUS IN THE HALLS AT THE HOSPITAL THAN WALMART. MAYBE LESS.’”

As The New York Times reporter wrote, the text message was not only inaccurate but xenophobic. In a statement, the University Medical Center of El Paso said the anesthesiologist was removed for “insubordination:”9

"The anesthesiologist was told on numerous occasions by his supervisor to not wear the N95 surgical mask while not in the Operating Room area or while not treating patients with infectious disease.”

Health Care Workers Are at Risk of Spreading Any Virus

The president-elect of the American Academy of Emergency Medicine told NPR10 she has heard multiple stories like Buckalew's from across the U.S. "We're hearing a lot of people saying that 'I'm not getting adequate PPE at my job, so I was able to buy PPE and I'm using what I buy.'"

Propublica11 highlights the dangers of health care workers who are not adequately protected in the story of Dr. John Gavin, emergency room physician in Amite, Louisiana. Gavin, 69, contracted the novel coronavirus while working in the emergency room.

When he was diagnosed March 12, 2020, and subsequently quarantined at home, he reported that the officials at Hood Memorial Hospital where he works had not yet changed any procedures to protect the doctors and nurses, nor their patients. At the time the ER did not have N95 respirator masks or gowns to protect the staff.

Because of a staff shortage, Gavin could not call in sick in the days before his diagnosis was confirmed. He showed up for work in the emergency room and treated patients, where he believes he exposed everyone he saw.

Health care workers are facing threats of disciplinary action and termination if they're found wearing masks outside of patient care areas. Megan Ranney, associate professor of emergency medicine, Brown University, told Scientific American:12

“… yes we should absolutely be able to wear procedural masks outside of patient rooms. We are all potential sources of infection and protecting our healthcare workforce is critical. Of course, we are likely to need to reuse these masks — but forbidding their use seems, to me, misguided.”

Hospital Support Personnel Without Information or Protection

Doctors and nurses are not the only workers on the front line who are short of equipment and information. One worker spoke to Vox, but didn't want to be identified for fear of repercussions from the hospital. She works in a south Florida hospital. And part of her job is to go with the doctors on rounds to see their patients. As Vox tells her story:13

“The new normal has shifted so much,” says the worker … As recently as early March, a supervisor laughed at her for wearing a mask when she was recovering from a cold. “She said she didn’t want me causing pandemonium,” she recounts. “This was a week before mask-wearing was mandatory.”

Other non-medical staff in the hospital are also at risk for contracting or passing along the virus. One working at a hospital in southern Kentucky did not want to be identified to the Vox reporter as he feared repercussions and job loss. Without adequate information about what protective measures should be taken, he asked his boss whose response was, “just wear gloves.”

His responsibilities include cleaning patient rooms and laboratories that have biohazardous waste. At the time of the report he did not have access to a mask and did not have the benefit of paid sick time. He told the reporter, “All this for 11 dollars an hour. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.”

National Nurses United14 published a survey of 8,200 nurses from around the country. They found just 46% had information about how to recognize and respond to possible cases and 58% of employers were screening all patients for travel and exposure history as well as fever and respiratory symptoms. However, only 55% had N95 masks and 24% had enough PPE to protect the staff.

Information flow also appeared to be sparse as only 31% of the nurses knew there was a plan in place to isolate patients suspected of being infected. The lack of equipment and training within hospital facilities increases the risk health care workers and patients may be passing viruses from one to another.

Not All Hospitals Have the Same Perspective

Longtime nurse Kevin Readel spoke to a reporter from Scientific American after he was terminated for insubordination when he refused to take off a mask while inserting an IV. During a conversation with human resources he shared, “… the entire discussion we had centered around me causing hysteria by wearing a mask.”15 He spoke freely, since he has lost his job and is suing the hospital.

While some hospitals appear to have a greater concern over the appearance of protecting patients and staff rather than educating patients and protecting staff, others have a different perspective. Queen Mary Hospital in Hong Kong mandates all health care workers always wear a mask. In a six-week survey, the hospital reported no health care worker or hospital-acquired infections.16

Some hospitals in the U.S. have also taken up this strategy. Northwell Health in New York asks all health care workers to wear masks while at the hospital. Senior vice president and chief medical officer David Battinelli said:17

“We are doing this to help preserve our workforce. We can build ventilators, but we can’t build health care workers. They can’t get sick. We also want our workforce to feel comfortable and safe working.”

Massachusetts General Hospital and Brigham and Women’s Hospital announced it is mandatory to wear face masks while at the facilities. On March 24, 2020, nurses at St. Joseph’s Women’s Hospital in Florida were told they18 “should not be wearing masks or gowns if not taking care of an islocation [sic] patient. (No exceptions.).”

Within days the hospital reversed the decision, telling a news reporter the hospital expects all staff to wear a mask while working. Multiple hospitals in Florida made a similar switch from telling staff they can’t wear masks to insisting they do. Martin Peebles, representative for the National Nurses United Union, is glad these precautions are finally being implemented:19

“I really wish that a lot of these precautions would have been put forth when we first suggested it about two or three weeks ago. If they can’t protect themselves, they can’t protect anyone.”

Pandemic Agitating Loss of Physician Autonomy

According to The New York Times,20 some of the animosity between physicians and administration stems from another source. In the past several decades, doctors have moved from private practice to becoming hospital employees, losing the autonomy associated with independent practice.

This has placed the physicians as employees to companies that sometimes place profits ahead of patients. According to Dr. Christopher Garofalo, it has created an environment that leaves physicians less empowered and more frustrated.

The New York Times reports of an email from a manager at Cleveland Clinic that was sent to a group of doctors, warning them not to “go rogue” by using masks around the hospital. Garofalo is a family doctor from Massachusetts who holds leadership positions in the state and serves as a delegate to the American Medical Association. He told the New York Times:21

“There’s been a loss of autonomy and a denigration going on for a couple of decades now. We’ll take a lot" and COVID-19 "is causing it to erupt."



from Articles https://ift.tt/3btpvmZ
via IFTTT

As reported in my April 7, 2020, article "Vitamins C and D Finally Adopted as Coronavirus Treatment," the largest hospital system in New York, Northwell Health, has been giving COVID-19 patients admitted into intensive care 1,500 milligrams of intravenous vitamin C three to four times a day in conjunction with the antimalarial drug hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azithromycin, both of which have shown promise in coronavirus treatment.1

According to Dr. Andrew G. Weber, a pulmonologist and critical-care specialist affiliated with two Northwell Health facilities on Long Island, "The patients who received vitamin C did significantly better than those who did not get vitamin C. It helps a tremendous amount, but it is not highlighted because it's not a sexy drug."2

NIAID Director Backpedals on Vitamin C and D Recommendations

Curiously, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and the face of the White House coronavirus response team, is now saying life probably will not go back to normal until we have the ability to vaccinate the entire global population against COVID-19.3

I say "curiously," as just four short years ago, in a Washingtonian article,4 "How to Avoid Getting Sick When You're Around People All Day," Fauci touted vitamins C and D as being good for boosting your immune system and fighting infectious disease. 

Vitamin C "can enhance your body's defense against microbes," he said — a statement backed by recent research showing vitamin C supplementation lowers your risk of the common cold.5 At the time, Fauci said he was taking 1,000 milligrams (mg) of vitamin C, himself, every day. "Many people also do not get enough vitamin D, which affects a lot of body functions, so that would be helpful, too," he added.

Yet, in a March 26, 2020, interview with RealClear Politics,6 he changed his tune, saying there was "no definite proof" that the vitamins work, even though some studies show they do. What changed? Why did he say vitamins C and D help boost immune function and ward off infectious disease four years ago, only to deny it now?

Global Vaccine Plan in Action?

Is Fauci simply promoting Bill Gates’ vaccine agenda? It's not an implausible idea, considering Fauci is on the Leadership Council board responsible for putting together Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Global Vaccine Action Plan — a collaboration between the Foundation, NIAID, UNICEF and the World Health Organization.7 As explained in a Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation press release:8

"The Global Vaccine Action Plan will enable greater coordination across all stakeholder groups — national governments, multilateral organizations, civil society, the private sector and philanthropic organizations — and will identify critical policy, resource, and other gaps that must be addressed to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines."

It's quite feasible that one "gap" that would need to be addressed "to realize the life-saving potential of vaccines" would be the elimination of inexpensive patent-free competition such as nutritional supplements.

Considering the fact that many reports from medical professionals treating COVID-19 patients are showing favorable results using old medicines and supplements such as IV vitamin C and zinc, there's absolutely no reason to announce the end of normalcy unless we vaccinate billions of people.

In fact, zinc is currently looking like one of the most important remedies against COVID-19. Compelling evidence suggests the reason the antimalarial drug chloroquine appears so useful in the treatment of COVID-19 is because it acts as a zinc ionophore (zinc transporter) so it improves zinc uptake into the cell.

Zinc is crucial for healthy immune function9 and a combination of zinc with a zinc ionophore was in 2010 shown to block the replication of SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV-1) in cell culture within minutes.10 Many of the symptoms of COVID-19 are also near-indistinguishable from those of zinc deficiency.11

In the featured Liberty Report video above, Dr. Ron Paul, former GOP congressman, also points out that Fauci's "doom and gloom predictions" of 2.2 million deaths from COVID-19 in the U.S. alone12 have completely collapsed, "with the new official prediction coming in under the normal flu numbers for 2018."

Indeed, April 8, 2020, a new model referred to as the Murray Model13 predicts COVID-19 will kill 60,000 in the U.S. by August14 — a far cry from 2.2 million! "Was it 'social distancing' that saved us?" Paul asks. "Let's look at the states and countries that did not lock down — they should have massively higher deaths. Do they?"

Listen to his report to find out (hint: No. For example, South Carolina, which did not shut down its economy, had only 63 deaths as of April 9, 2020, while Colorado, which did shut down, had 193).

COVID-19 Vaccine Will Bypass Safety Testing

Even if a vaccine comes out in a year, which is astoundingly rapid, we will have no proof that it's safe and effective since researchers are foregoing some of the normally required safety testing in order to get a vaccine out as soon as possible.15

What if it turns into a repeat of the fast-tracked H1N1 swine flu vaccine released in Europe during the swine flu pandemic of 2009-2010?

In July 2009, the U.S. National Biodefense Safety Board unanimously decided to forgo most safety and efficacy tests to get the vaccine out by September of that year.16,17 Europe also accelerated its approval process, allowing manufacturers to skip large-scale human trials18 — a decision that turned out to have tragic consequences19 for an untold number of children and teens across Europe.

Over the next few years, the ASO3-adjuvanted swine flu vaccine Pandemrix (used in Europe but not in the U.S. during 2009-2010) was causally linked20 to childhood narcolepsy, which abruptly skyrocketed in several countries.21,22

Children and teens in Finland,23 the U.K.24 and Sweden25 were among the hardest hit. Further analyses discerned a rise in narcolepsy among adults who received the vaccine as well, although the link wasn't as obvious as that in children and adolescents.26

A 2019 study27 reports finding a "novel association between Pandemrix-associated narcolepsy and the noncoding RNA gene GDNF-AS1" — a gene thought to regulate the production of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor or GDNF, a protein that plays an important role in neuronal survival.

They also confirmed a strong association between vaccine-induced narcolepsy and a certain haplotype, suggesting "variation in genes related to immunity and neuronal survival may interact to increase the susceptibility to Pandemrix-induced narcolepsy in certain individuals."

There's Much We Still Do Not Know

The fact that health authorities seem to have conveniently forgotten this travesty is shocking, considering it was only a decade ago. Here we are again, awaiting another fast-tracked vaccine for a virus we still don't even fully understand.

For example, in recent days, some doctors have noted their patients' symptoms appear closer to altitude sickness than pneumonia.28 Their blood oxygen levels are devastatingly low, yet they're not gasping for air. Doctors in the field are also noticing that patients put on ventilators have a much higher death rate than those who are not ventilated.29,30 Yet standard of care for low blood oxygen calls for ventilation.

This situation really highlights the danger of making medical assumptions. Fauci and Gates insist a vaccine is the only thing that can open the world back up for business, yet they have no evidence to back up the notion that a vaccine is the best way to protect public health.

To top it off, Fauci and Gates are both talking about the possibility of rolling out a national tracking system with implantable vaccine certificates. People who are unwilling to take a gamble with a novel coronavirus vaccine may actually have their social and professional lives restricted indefinitely, should such a plan be implemented.

Remember, the devastating Pandemrix vaccine was found to induce narcolepsy by affecting a noncoding RNA gene. It wasn't because it contained a toxic substance such as, say, aluminum, which, theoretically, could be chelated out.

As of right now, one of the main contenders for a COVID-19 vaccine is also using an entirely novel method of manufacturing. The biotech company Moderna is using synthetic mRNA to instruct DNA to produce the same kind of proteins COVID-19 uses to gain access into our cells.

The idea is that your immune system will learn to recognize and kill the real virus. What the limited human trials on this vaccine will NOT tell us is whether it might have devastating genetic effects. No one expected Pandemrix to have genetic effects. Yet it did.

Vitamin D in COVID-19 Treatment

It's scientifically indisputable that vitamin D plays an important role in human health, and findings from The Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA)31 and a vitamin D review paper32 published in the journal Nutrients, April 2, 2020, both suggest vitamin D deficiency could have serious implications for COVID-19. As reported by Medical Xpress, April 6, 2020:33

"The report,34 'Vitamin D deficiency in Ireland — Implications for COVID-19. Results from the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing (TILDA),' finds that vitamin D plays a critical role in preventing respiratory infections, reducing antibiotic use, and boosting the immune system response to infections.

With one in eight Irish adults under 50 deficient in vitamin D, the report highlights the importance of increasing intake … TILDA researchers recommend that adults over 50 should take supplements — not just in winter, but all year round if they don't get enough sun …

Professor Rose Anne Kenny, principal investigator of TILDA, said: 'We have evidence to support a role for vitamin D in the prevention of chest infections, particularly in older adults who have low levels. In one study Vitamin D reduced the risk of chest infections to half in people who took supplements.

Though we do not know specifically of the role of vitamin D in COVID infections, given its wider implications for improving immune responses ... at-risk cohorts should ensure they have an adequate intake of vitamin D.'"

The second paper, published in the journal Nutrients, carries the telling title, "Evidence That Vitamin D Supplementation Could Reduce Risk of Influenza and COVID-19 Infections and Death."35 As reported in the abstract:

"The world is in the grip of the COVID-19 pandemic. Public health measures that can reduce the risk of infection and death in addition to quarantines are desperately needed.

This article reviews the roles of vitamin D in reducing the risk of respiratory tract infections, knowledge about the epidemiology of influenza and COVID-19, and how vitamin D supplementation might be a useful measure to reduce risk. Through several mechanisms, vitamin D can reduce risk of infections.

Those mechanisms include inducing cathelicidins and defensins that can lower viral replication rates and reducing concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines that produce the inflammation that injures the lining of the lungs, leading to pneumonia, as well as increasing concentrations of anti-inflammatory cytokines …

Evidence supporting the role of vitamin D in reducing risk of COVID-19 includes that the outbreak occurred in winter, a time when 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations are lowest; that the number of cases in the Southern Hemisphere near the end of summer are low …

Vitamin D deficiency has been found to contribute to acute respiratory distress syndrome; and … case-fatality rates increase with age and with chronic disease comorbidity, both of which are associated with lower 25(OH)D concentration.

To reduce the risk of infection, it is recommended that people at risk of influenza and/or COVID-19 consider taking 10,000 IU/d of vitamin D3 for a few weeks to rapidly raise 25(OH)D concentrations, followed by 5000 IU/d. The goal should be to raise 25(OH)D concentrations above 40–60 ng/mL (100–150 nmol/L). For treatment of people who become infected with COVID-19, higher vitamin D3 doses might be useful."

Dark-Skinned Individuals at Greater Risk for COVID-19

An opinion36 in The Wall Street Journal by psychiatrist Dr. Vatsal G. Thakkar also points out that “black Americans are dying of COVID-19 at a higher rate than whites,” and vitamin D deficiency, which weakens immune function, is far more prevalent among those with darker skin color. He writes:

“Researchers last week released the first data37 supporting this link. They found that the nations with the highest mortality rates — Italy, Spain and France — also had the lowest average vitamin D levels among countries affected by the pandemic …

As an Indian-American, my skin type is Fitzpatrick IV, or “moderate brown.” Compared with my white friends, I need double or triple the sun exposure to synthesize the same amount of vitamin D, so I supplement with 5,000 international units of vitamin D3 daily, which maintains my level in the normal range. Most African-Americans are Fitzpatrick type V or VI, so they would need even more.”

Vitamin D Deficiency Contributes to ARDS

Thakkar’s views are also supported by research38 published in the journal Thorax, in which they show patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), resulting from severe respiratory illness such as pneumonia, by and large tend to be deficient in vitamin D, and that vitamin D deficiency contributes directly to ARDS.

Vitamin D Level ARDS vs controls

The study also found that, for those at risk of developing ARDS after surgery, pre-surgery vitamin D level was the only measure indicative of whether or not a patient would develop lung injury after surgery. After adjusting for confounding factors, surgical patients with vitamin D levels below 8 ng/ml (20 nmol/L) had a 4.2fold higher risk of developing ARDS than those with levels at or above 8 ng/ml.



from Articles https://ift.tt/2VMMa7d
via IFTTT

Experts have identified a new protein in the pathway that leads to Alzheimer's disease. Researchers used the 'molecular scissors' of CRISPR/Cas9 to search for new genes related to the neurodegenerative disease. Researchers tested a total of 19,150 individual genes for their effect on amyloid beta levels and ruled out all but one: calcium and integrin-binding protein 1 (CIB1).

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2RYPmvn

Along with widespread illness and death, the COVID-19 pandemic is also causing massive economic disruption. Stay-at-home measures and business shutdowns have prevented millions of people from working. In just four weeks, between mid-March and mid-April, 22 million Americans filed for unemployment benefits. These numbers are bound to spiral higher.

Given all the hardships — and new predictions that cases of COVID-19 will begin falling in most states in the coming weeks — when might people be able to return to work? Thus far, the answers are quite uncertain.

Although the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has issued some federal guidelines, you may need to follow stricter state or local regulations and employer policies. Some experts have suggested serologic (antibody) tests to determine who has had the virus and to guide decisions about returning to work. And the experiences of countries that have successfully slowed cases of COVID-19 and loosened restrictions on work will come into play, too. Below I’ve explained a bit about each approach.

Return-to-work recommendations from the CDC

Recent return-to-work guidelines from the CDC apply to relatively few American workplaces:

  • For workers in healthcare or outside of healthcare who have confirmed or suspected COVID-19: The guidelines allow discontinuation of isolation and returning to work once fever has resolved, symptoms have improved, and swab tests for SARS-CoV-2 are negative twice at least 24 hours apart. If testing is not available, those who had COVID-19 should wait until they’ve had three or more days of improved symptoms without fever and seven days have passed since symptoms began.
  • For critical infrastructure workers (such as healthcare workers and people who work in law enforcement) who were exposed to someone with confirmed or suspected COVID-19: New guidelines now permit continuing to work if people have no symptoms, no fever, wear a mask for 14 days, maintain six-foot physical distancing from others (“as work duties permit”), and disinfect and clean work spaces well. These new guidelines relax prior requirements that urged such workers to remain in quarantine for 14 days before returning to work.

As you might expect, there are caveats. As mentioned, local regulations or employer policies may be more stringent than these recommendations, so check with your employer and primary care physician before going back to work. And a disclaimer notes the guidelines “cannot prevent all instances of secondary spread.”

What about using serologic (antibody) tests to guide our return to work?

Serologic tests identify antibodies in your blood that your immune system produced to fight off the virus and to be ready in case you’re exposed to it again. If present, they indicate that you were previously infected, even if you were unaware of it. These tests are quite different from nasal swab testing performed to identify current infection.

If you never had symptoms or your symptoms completely resolved, a positive serologic test likely indicates that you have some protection from re-infection (for at least a while) and are unlikely to be contagious. So, positive results might let you know that it’s safe for you to return to work (and to be around others at home or work who may be susceptible to the virus).

Additionally, if your body made antibodies in high amounts, you may be a plasma donor candidate, as your antibodies could be used to help someone who is struggling to recover from COVID-19.

Sounds great, right? It is if you are feeling well and your serologic tests are positive. But what if they are negative? And what else do we need to consider?

Negative antibody tests: Good news and bad news

A negative serologic test generally means you haven’t been exposed to the virus. So, congratulations, it seems you successfully avoided infection and were never a threat to spread it to others! On the other hand, you still may catch the virus from someone else. A negative result is not helpful in knowing when it’s okay to return to work or to relax certain physical distancing measures.

Until widespread serologic testing is performed, we won’t know how many people are already immune to the virus that causes COVID-19, but it’s possible that most people will have a negative result.

Why? For one thing, mitigation efforts seem to have been effective at limiting exposure. And while we tend to hear about the “hot spots” where infection is spreading rapidly, many areas of America and the world have had low infection rates.

In the US, projections in mid-April by the University of Washington suggest that we’ll have up to a million cases of confirmed COVID-19 by August 2020. If there are 10 times as many unconfirmed cases of COVID-19 as confirmed cases, as Angelo Borrelli, a government official in Italy, believes, another 10 million people were exposed to COVID-19, but were asymptomatic or never got tested. Given a US population of 330 million people, that means 3% may have positive antibodies and the remaining 97% of Americans may never have been exposed to the virus. All of the people who weren’t exposed would be expected to have negative serologic test results, which aren’t helpful in making decisions in the coming weeks and months about who can safely return to work.

Serologic testing raises several other issues, as well:

  • Early testing has been plagued by inaccuracy
  • It’s not yet confirmed that positive antibodies are protective
  • Even if they are protective, it’s not known how long that protection will last
  • And finally, it’s likely that we can’t do antibody testing for enough people in the near term to provide reassurance about the safety of returning to work soon.

Once enough people (perhaps 60% to 70% of the population) have protective antibodies due to infection or vaccination, there will be more confidence in the safety of returning to work. But a vaccine is a year or more away.

Where does this leave us in returning to work?

While there are no uniform guidelines to rely upon for most workers, here’s how some experts, public officials, and other countries have responded to the question of when employees might return to work:

  • Spain recently allowed certain industries, including manufacturing and construction, to resume operations as long as protective equipment is provided and physical distancing measures are maintained. China is also beginning to relax restrictions, including in Wuhan, where the pandemic began.
  • Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and member of the White House’s coronavirus task force, recently predicted a gradual reopening of parts of the country, perhaps starting as soon as May 2020. However, he has repeatedly warned that the timeline depends on the behavior of the virus and the effectiveness of mitigation efforts.
  • Relying on serologic testing to decide who can return to work has been a focus of government leaders, including those in New York (such as Governor Cuomo), Great Britain, and Italy. You can expect to see a big push in the coming weeks for widespread serologic testing, though as discussed above it remains unclear how helpful this will be.

“Reopening the economy” is likely something that will happen gradually, along with ongoing monitoring for renewed outbreaks. For example, restaurants and smaller offices might reopen at partial capacity, with employees hired back in gradually increasing numbers if all goes well. Later, sporting events and concert venues may reopen. This will probably vary by geography: areas with fewer cases of COVID-19 may ramp up toward higher employment levels more quickly than those hit hardest by the outbreak. As workers return to their jobs, many of the current precautions will likely remain in place, such as frequent disinfectant cleaning and avoiding unnecessary crowding and physical contact.

The bottom line

In the coming weeks and months, a drop in cases of COVID-19 is expected across the US, according to models from the University of Washington. Once that happens, public health experts and national, state, and local leaders will likely give the go-ahead for employers across many industries to gradually reopen, and employees will return to work. That could happen in some areas as soon as May or June.

But, the decision to allow businesses to reopen must be made despite considerable uncertainty: if businesses reopen too soon, the outbreak may flare up again. Wait too long and many businesses and the people who work in them may never recover financially.

Since you can’t return to your job until your place of work resumes operations, workers everywhere have to wait for that to happen. Even after it does, it may be a while before we know if it was too soon, too late, or the right move.

The post As the pandemic drags on, when can we get back to work? appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.



from Harvard Health Blog https://ift.tt/2VpVdM7

Allergies caused by the common ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, impact millions, and in Europe alone, around 13.5 million people suffer with symptoms, resulting in 7.4 billion Euros worth of health costs per year, according to the research. The study suggests the leaf beetle, Ophraella communa, could reduce the number of people affected by the pollen and the associated economic impacts, since the beetle -- itself a recent arrival in Europe -- loves to munch on the invasive plant.

from Top Health News -- ScienceDaily https://ift.tt/2wVIo2L

As we get older, occasional forgetfulness may become more worrisome. Is this the start of dementia, or are we just stressed? Has the loss of structure due to retirement led to this change? Or could we be suffering from another illness, maybe the same illness as our son or granddaughter, who also struggle with attention and organization?

What are the symptoms of ADHD in older adults?

Although the diagnosis of ADHD (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) is often associated with school-age children, this condition may persist throughout adulthood and into old age. Older adults with ADHD struggle with attention, memory, and planning. They may struggle with finishing projects or remembering information consistently, and they may become distracted during conversations and experience difficulty maintaining relationships. When older adults lose the structure of employment, they may experience an exacerbation of symptoms, similar to when young adults with ADHD lose the structure of school. During retirement older adults may start to re-experience challenges with time-management and procrastination, which may result in feelings of anxiety or guilt.

Is it normal aging or ADHD?

When people share concerns with their doctor about their memory, attention, or difficulty completing tasks, they may receive a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a stage between normal aging and dementia. However, older adults with ADHD may never have received a diagnosis of ADHD, especially if they had learned skills to compensate during their lifetime. To help doctors differentiate between mild cognitive impairment and ADHD in old age, the timing of symptoms and family history can provide good clues (after ruling out potential medical causes, such as thyroid or seizure disorders).

ADHD is one of the most heritable disorders in medicine, so having children, grandchildren, or siblings with this diagnosis should increase a doctor’s suspicion that their patient’s symptoms may be the result of ADHD. Understanding a patient’s timeline of symptoms is also crucial, as symptoms must have occurred in childhood to make the diagnosis of ADHD. Screening tools in adults may also be useful, such as the ADHD Self-Report Scale, although a positive screen doesn’t always mean you have ADHD.

What are effective treatments for ADHD in older adults?

The most effective medications for the treatment of ADHD in older adults are stimulant medications such as methylphenidate or dextroamphetamine. These medications provide significant benefit to older adults, as well as children and younger adults. However, in older adults doctors must also consider the cardiac risks of these medications, including increased blood pressure and heart rate, as well as a potential increase in the risk of an irregular heartbeat, particularly in people with known heart blockage.

Nonmedication options are also valuable to help a person create structure and learn organization tools, such as use of a daily planner, alarms, and lists. Therapists or coaches can help older adults with ADHD through the use of behavioral therapies, which may lead to improved time and money management, increased productivity, reduced anxiety, and higher life satisfaction.

What can you do in addition to getting medical treatment?

If you suspect your symptoms may be the result of ADHD, especially if a close family member has received this diagnosis, do not hesitate to ask your primary care physician for a referral to a specialist with expertise in the diagnosis and management of ADHD in older adults. In addition, the following strategies can be useful in managing symptoms at home.

Exercise regularly. Physical activity increases brain neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin, which can affect attention.

Improve sleep. Set up a bedtime routine, avoid caffeine after noon, and try to avoid electronic devices within an hour of bedtime.

Enlist the help of others. Family members and other supports may help with creating structure and simplifying tasks.

Set reminders. Calendars, alarms, written notes, and lists can provide additional assistance in remembering tasks.

The post Struggling with attention and organization as you age? It could be ADHD, not dementia appeared first on Harvard Health Blog.



from Harvard Health Blog https://ift.tt/3eEXOcY

MKRdezign

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Powered by Blogger.
Javascript DisablePlease Enable Javascript To See All Widget